Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer
Review
Published: 03-06-2022

Estratégias fotoprotetoras contra fotocarcinogênese e fotoenvelhecimento

Curso de Nutrição, Centro Universitário UNA, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brasil
Curso de Nutrição, Centro Universitário UNA, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brasil
Curso de Nutrição, Centro Universitário UNA, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brasil
Curso de Nutrição, Centro Universitário UNA, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brasil
solar protection agents solar exposure photocarcinogenesis photoaging

Abstract

The sunlight is not only indispensable to life and physiological processes, but it is also associated with the development of photoaging and, in some more severe cases, with photocarcinogenesis in genetically prone and vulnerable phototype populations in a proportional exposure/risk ratio. Considering the different methods of solar protection, especially the various formulations of organic and inorganic sunscreens, the present study aimed to review the best protective strategy against the damaging effects of the sun rays, enabling the sustainable promotion of health and quality of life. We have concluded that the use of clothing protecting agents associated with sunscreens of wide spectrum—those that combine inorganic/barrier compounds with organic/filtering agents—results in the most efficient solar protection combination, by associating a higher degree of UVA and UVB waves protection with high photostability and water stability to subjects under sustained sun exposure, especially those who work under these conditions.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

  1. Dupont L, Pereira DN. Sun exposure and sun protection habits in high school students from a city south of the country. An Bras Dermatol 2012;87(01):90–95
  2. Madrid JFP, Cabrera CG. Encapsulación de un filtro solar (avobenzona) en liposomas. Rev Cub Farm 2011;45(03):331–340
  3. Lichtenstein A. Vitamin D: enough already? Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992) 2015;61(04):291–292
  4. Carter R, Marks R, Hill D. Could a national skin cancer primary prevention campaign in Australia be worthwhile?: an economic perspective Health Promot Int 1999;14(01):73–82
  5. Duro Mota EMT, Páez C, Serrano CS. El sol y los filtros solares. Medifam. 2003;13(03):39–45
  6. Cokkinides VE, Johnston-Davis K, Weinstock M, et al. Sun exposure and sun-protection behaviors and attitudes among U.S. youth, 11 to 18 years of age. Prev Med 2001;33(03):141–151
  7. International Agency for Research on Cancer. IARC handbooks of cancer prevention. IARC, 2005; 10.
  8. Schalka S, Reis VM. Sun protection factor: meaning and controversies. An Bras Dermatol 2011;86(03):507–515
  9. Balogh TS, Velasco MV, Pedriali CA, Kaneko TM, Baby AR. Ultraviolet radiation protection: current available resources in photoprotection. An Bras Dermatol 2011;86(04):732–742
  10. Lucena EES, Costa DC, da Silveira EJ, Lima KC. Occupation and factors associated with exposure to the sun among beach workers. Cien Saude Colet 2014;19(04):1171–1178
  11. Kullavanijaya P, Lim HW. Photoprotection. J Am Acad Dermatol 2005;52(06):937–958, quiz 959–962
  12. Forestier S. Rationale for sunscreen development. J Am Acad Dermatol 2008;58(05, Suppl 2):S133–S138
  13. Rafferty TS, McKenzie RC, Hunter JA, et al. Differential expression of selenoproteins by human skin cells and protection by selenium from UVB-radiation-induced cell death. Biochem J 1998;332(Pt1):231–236

How to Cite

Gregório, E. L., Amorim, M. M. A., Almeida, J. C. B. C. L. de, & Paula, R. B. O. de. (2022). Estratégias fotoprotetoras contra fotocarcinogênese e fotoenvelhecimento. International Journal of Nutrology, 11(2), 56–60. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1669406