Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer
International Journal of Nutrology
Review
DOI: 10.54448/ijn23233
Submitted: 07-10-2023
Published: 07-10-2023

Tissue regeneration and gut microbiota-skeletal muscle axis via microRNAs and nutrition: a systematic review

Dr. Rodrigo Junqueira Institute, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
Dr. Rodrigo Junqueira Institute, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
Muscle regeneration Nutrition Gut microbiota microRNAs Skeletal muscle Performance. Athletes

Abstract

Introduction: In the scenario of muscle regeneration in athletes, maintenance of skeletal muscle function is the prerequisite for tissue homeostasis and increased performance. MicroRNAs play a positive role in expanding our understanding of the controlling factors for skeletal muscle function. Recent progress has been made regarding gut microbiota, regenerative nutrition, and skeletal muscle metabolism. Objective: It was to carry out a systematic review of the main relations of regeneration of skeletal muscle-gut microbiota through nutrological functions, cells, and microRNAs. Methods: The systematic review rules of the PRISMA Platform were followed. The research was carried out from February to April 2023 in Scopus, PubMed, Science Direct, Scielo, and Google Scholar databases. The quality of the studies was based on the GRADE instrument and the risk of bias was analyzed according to the Cochrane instrument. Results and Conclusion: A total of 217 articles were found. A total of 97 articles were fully evaluated and 49 were included and developed in the present systematic review study. Considering the Cochrane tool for risk of bias, the overall assessment resulted in 54 studies at high risk of bias and 34 studies that did not meet the GRADE. It was concluded that miRNAs are widely present in skeletal muscle and play an irreplaceable tuning role in the proliferation, differentiation, apoptosis, development, and other physiological processes of skeletal muscle cells. The proposal that miRNAs are primarily involved in the cell's stress response makes miRNAs ideal for mediating the skeletal muscle response to changes in contractile activity. Research has accumulated evidence that confirms that miRNAs have played an important regulatory role in cell proliferation and differentiation, thus regulating skeletal muscle growth as highlighted in the small intestine by intestinal stem cells (LGR5+). The ketogenic or high-glucose diet regulates the self-renewal balance of LGR5+. Self-renewal and HSC differentiation can be regulated by manipulating vitamin C, A, or D levels and valine restriction. The composition of each athlete's microbiome influences sports performance.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

  1. Liu C, Wu X, Vulugundam G, Gokulnath P, Li G, Xiao J. Exercise Promotes Tissue Regeneration: Mechanisms Involved and Therapeutic Scope. Sports Med Open. 2023 May 6;9(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s40798-023-00573-9.
  2. Takemoto Y, Fukada SI. Molecular mechanism maintaining muscle satellite cells and the roles in sarcopenia. Clin. Calcium. 2017;27:339–344.
  3. Bohnert KR, McMillan JD, Kumar A. Emerging Roles of ER Stress and Unfolded Protein Response Pathways in Skeletal Muscle Health and Disease. J. Cell. Physiol. 2017 doi: 10.1002/jcp.25852.
  4. Bombieri F, Schena F, Pellegrini B, Barone P, Tinazzi M, Erro R. Walking on four limbs: A systematic review of Nordic Walking in Parkinson disease. Parkinsonism Relat. Disord. 2017;38:8–12. doi: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2017.02.004.
  5. Kasukawa Y, Miyakoshi N, Hongo M, Ishikawa Y, Kudo D, Suzuki M, Mizutani T, Kimura R, Ono Y, Shimada Y. Age-related changes in muscle strength and spinal kyphosis angles in an elderly Japanese population. Clin. Interv. Aging. 2017;12:413–420. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S113352.
  6. Fan J, Kou X, Yang Y, Chen N. MicroRNA-Regulated Proinflammatory Cytokines in Sarcopenia. Mediat. Inflamm. 2016;2016:1438686. doi: 10.1155/2016/1438686.
  7. Lee RC, Feinbaum RL, Ambros V. The C. elegans heterochronic gene lin-4 encodes small RNAs with antisense complementarity to lin-14. Cell. 1993;75:843–854.
  8. Skorski S, Mujika I, Bosquet L, Meeusen R, Coutts AJ, Meyer T. The Temporal Relationship Between Exercise, Recovery Processes, and Changes in Performance. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2019;14(8):1015-1021. doi:10.1123/ijspp.2018-0668.
  9. Tobin MJ. Why Physiology Is Critical to the Practice of Medicine: A 40-year Personal Perspective. Clin Chest Med. 2019;40(2):243-257. doi:10.1016/j.ccm.2019.02.012.
  10. Foster C, Rodriguez-Marroyo JA, de Koning JJ. Monitoring Training Loads: The Past, the Present, and the Future. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2017;12(Suppl 2):S22-S28. doi:10.1123/ijspp.2016-0388.
  11. Margaritelis NV, Paschalis V, Theodorou AA, Kyparos A, Nikolaidis MG. Redox basis of exercise physiology. Redox Biol. 2020;35:101499. doi:10.1016/j.redox.2020.101499.
  12. Ruegsegger GN, Booth FW. Health Benefits of Exercise. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2018 Jul 2;8(7). pii: a029694.
  13. Cheng AJ, Yamada T, Rassier DE, Andersson DC, Westerblad H, Lanner JT. Reactive oxygen/nitrogen species and contractile function in skeletal muscle during fatigue and recovery. J Physiol. 2016 Sep 15;594(18):5149-60.
  14. Ferraro F. et al. Adult stem cells and their niches. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2010, 695, 155–168.
  15. Blanpain, C. et al. Self-renewal, multipotency, and the existence of two cell populations within an epithelial stem cell niche. Cell. 2004, 118, 635–648.
  16. Chacón-Martínez CA et al. Hair follicle stem cell cultures reveal selforganizing plasticity of stem cells and their progeny. EMBO J. 2017, 36, 151– 164.
  17. Yu X, Zuo Q. MicroRNAs in the regeneration of skeletal muscle. Front Biosci (Landmark Ed). 2013 Jan 1;18(2):608-15. doi: 10.2741/4124.
  18. Liu C, Wu X, Vulugundam G, Gokulnath P, Li G, Xiao J. Exercise Promotes Tissue Regeneration: Mechanisms Involved and Therapeutic Scope. Sports Med Open. 2023 May 6;9(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s40798-023-00573-9.
  19. Hanna BS, Wang G, Galván-Peña S, Mann AO, Ramirez RN, Muñoz-Rojas AR, Smith K, Wan M, Benoist C, Mathis D. The gut microbiota promotes distal tissue regeneration via RORγ+ regulatory T cell emissaries. Immunity. 2023 Apr 11;56(4):829-846.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2023.01.033.
  20. Rodríguez-Colman MJ. et al. Interplay between metabolic identities in the intestinal crypt supports stem cell function. Nature. 2017, 543, 424.
  21. Snoeck HW. Mitochondrial regulation of hematopoietic stem cells. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 2017, 49, 91–98.
  22. Zheng, X. et al. Metabolic reprogramming during neuronal differentiation from aerobic glycolysis to neuronal oxidative phosphorylation. Elife, 2016, 5, e13374.
  23. Flores A et al. Lactate dehydrogenase activity drives hair follicle stem cell activation. Nat. Cell Biol. 2017, 19, 1017–1026.
  24. Rinschen MM. et al. Identification of bioactive metabolites using activity metabolomics. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2019, 20, 353–367.
  25. Kirby TJ, McCarthy JJ. MicroRNAs in skeletal muscle biology and exercise adaptation. Free Radic Biol Med. 2013 Sep;64:95-105. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2013.07.004.
  26. Zhang S, Chen N. Regulatory Role of MicroRNAs in Muscle Atrophy during Exercise Intervention. Int J Mol Sci. 2018 Jan 30;19(2):405. doi: 10.3390/ijms19020405.
  27. Buckingham M. Skeletal muscle formation in vertebrates. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 2001;11:440–448. doi: 10.1016/S0959-437X(00)00215-X.
  28. Nie M, Deng ZL, Liu J, Wang DZ. Noncoding RNAs, Emerging Regulators of Skeletal Muscle Development and Diseases. BioMed Res. Int. 2015;2015:676575. doi: 10.1155/2015/676575.
  29. Ge Y, Chen J. MicroRNAs in skeletal myogenesis. Cell Cycle. 2011;10:441– 448. doi: 10.4161/cc.10.3.14710.
  30. Potthoff MJ, Olson EN. MEF2: A central regulator of diverse developmental programs. Development. 2007;134:4131–4140. doi: 10.1242/dev.008367.
  31. Harding RL, Velleman SG. MicroRNA regulation of myogenic satellite cell proliferation and differentiation. Mol. Cell. Biochem. 2016;412:181–195. doi: 10.1007/s11010-015-2625-6.
  32. Sun Y, Ge Y, Drnevich J, Zhao Y, Band M, Chen J. Mammalian target of rapamycin regulates miRNA-1 and follistatin in skeletal myogenesis. J. Cell Biol. 2010;189:1157–1169. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200912093.
  33. Chen JF, Mandel EM, Thomson JM, Wu Q, Callis TE, Hammond SM, Conlon FL, Wang DZ. The role of microRNA-1 and microRNA-133 in skeletal muscle proliferation and differentiation. Nat. Genet. 2006;38:228–233. doi: 10.1038/ng1725.
  34. Anderson C, Catoe H, Werner R. MIR-206 regulates connexin43 expression during skeletal muscle development. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006;34:5863–5871. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkl743.
  35. Cui Y, Xie S, Luan J, Zhou X, Han J. Quantitative proteomics and protein network analysis of A549 lung cancer cells affected by miR-206. Biosci. Trends. 2013;7:259–263. doi: 10.5582/bst.2013.v7.6.259.
  36. Li RC, Tao J, Guo YB, Wu HD, Liu RF, Bai Y, Lv ZZ, Luo GZ, Li LL, Wang M., et al. In vivo suppression of microRNA-24 prevents the transition toward decompensated hypertrophy in aortic-constricted mice. Circ. Res. 2013;112:601–605. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.112.300806.
  37. Sun Q, Zhang Y, Yang G, Chen X, Zhang Y, Cao G, Wang J, Sun Y, Zhang P, Fan M, et al. Transforming growth factor-beta-regulated miR-24 promotes skeletal muscle differentiation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2008;36:2690–2699. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkn032.
  38. Bakre A, Wu W, Hiscox J, Spann K, Teng MN, Tripp RA. Human respiratory syncytial virus non-structural protein NS1 modifies miR-24 expression via transforming growth factor-beta. J. Gen. Virol. 2015;96:3179–3191. doi: 10.1099/jgv.0.000261.
  39. Crist CG, Montarras D, Pallafacchina G, Rocancourt D, Cumano A, Conway SJ, Buckingham M. Muscle stem cell behavior is modified by microRNA-27 regulation of Pax3 expression. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2009;106:13383– 13387. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0900210106.
  40. Antoniou A., Mastroyiannopoulos N.P., Uney J.B., Phylactou L.A. miR-186 inhibits muscle cell differentiation through myogenin regulation. J. Biol. Chem. 2014;289:3923–3935. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M113.507343.
  41. Agathocleous, M. et al. Ascorbate regulates haematopoietic stem cell function and leukaemogenesis. Nature. 2017, 549, 476–481.
  42. Shapira SN, Christofk HR. Metabolic Regulation of Tissue Stem Cells. Trends Cell Biol. 2020 Jul;30(7):566-576. doi: 10.1016/j.tcb.2020.04.004.
  43. Stine RR. et al. PRDM16 maintains homeostasis of the intestinal epithelium by controlling region-specific metabolism. Cell Stem Cell. 2019, 25, 830–845.e8.
  44. Sato T. et al. Single Lgr5 stem cells build crypt–villus structures in vitro without a mesenchymal niche. Nature. 2009, 459, 262–265.
  45. Bricker DK. et al. A mitochondrial pyruvate carrier required for pyruvate uptake in yeast, Drosophila, and humans. Science, 2012, 337, 96.
  46. Herzig, S. et al. Identification and functional expression of the mitochondrial pyruvate carrier. Science. 2012, 337, 93.
  47. Schell JC. et al. Control of intestinal stem cell function and proliferation by mitochondrial pyruvate metabolism. Nat. Cell Biol. 2017, 19, 1027–1036.
  48. Cheng CW. et al. Ketone body signaling mediates intestinal stem cell homeostasis and adaptation to diet. Cell. 2019, 178, 1115–1131.e15.
  49. Alonso S and Yilmaz ÖH. Nutritional regulation of intestinal stem cells. Annu. Rev. Nutr. 2018, 38, 273–301.

How to Cite

Junqueira, R. A. C., & Pinto, A. C. (2023). Tissue regeneration and gut microbiota-skeletal muscle axis via microRNAs and nutrition: a systematic review. International Journal of Nutrology, 16(2). https://doi.org/10.54448/ijn23233