Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer
Review
Published: 07-30-2025

Palliative medicine and nutritional therapy in critically ill oncological patients: a systematic review

Dr. Dionisio AM Nunes Clinic- 370 São José Street, Itapiranga, Santa Catarina, Brazil
Clinical Hospital of the State University of Campinas. Zeferino Vaz University City - Barão Geraldo, Campinas, Brazil
Medical Clinic. João Wyclif Street, 111, rooms 1701 and 1702, Palhano Gleba, Londrina, Brazil
Medical Clinic. Pedro de Toledo street, 1800, Vila Clementino, São Paulo, Brazi
Medical Clinic. Barão Geraldo de Rezende street, 97, room 905, Botafogo, Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil
Medical Clinic. Dr. Renato Paes de Barros street,, 901, room 72, Itaim Bibi, São Paulo, Brazil
Medical Clinic. Rua Nilo Cairo, 257 Cj. 503 - Centro - Curitiba – Paraná, Brazil
Osvaldo Cruz Hospital, São Paulo, Brazil
Anestro. Rio de Janeiro Avenue, 805, Novo Horizonte, Cacoal, Rondônia, Brazil
Adventista de Manaus Hospital. Gov. Danilo de Matos Areosa avenue, 139, Industrial District I, Manaus, Amazonas, Brazil
Critical patients Cancer Nutritional therapy Palliative care

Abstract

Introduction: In nutritional therapies, appropriate or precise nutritional interventions are used in critically ill patients. Nutrition is considered a palliative treatment. Dietary counseling, provision of nutritional support, and alleviation of diet-related issues should be an essential component of a holistic approach to palliative and end-of-life care. Objective: This study aimed to highlight the main clinical outcomes and guidelines on nutritional therapies and palliative care in critically ill cancer patients. Methods: The PRISMA Platform systematic review rules were followed. The search was carried out from June to August 2024 in the Scopus, PubMed, Science Direct, Scielo, and Google Scholar databases. The quality of the studies was based on the GRADE instrument and the risk of bias was analyzed according to the Cochrane instrument. Results and Conclusion: 133 articles were found. A total of 44 articles were evaluated in full and 22 were included and developed in the present systematic review study. Considering the Cochrane tool for risk of bias, the overall assessment resulted in 22 studies with a high risk of bias and 27 studies that did not meet GRADE and AMSTAR-2. Most studies showed homogeneity in their results, with X2=75.7%>50%. It was concluded that according to the ESPEN and ASPEN guidelines, no differences in clinical outcomes were identified between numerous nutritional interventions, including increased energy or protein intake, parenteral nutrition or isocaloric enteral nutrition, supplemental parenteral nutrition or different mixed oil lipid injectable emulsions. However, clinical judgment and close monitoring along with appropriate palliative care are required. Decisionmaking in this field must be carried out on an individual basis, weighing the benefits and harms that may cause to patients' quality of life. The guidelines recommend that, if oral food intake remains inadequate despite counseling and oral nutritional supplements, enteral nutrition or, if this is not sufficient or feasible, parenteral nutrition (supplemental or total) should be considered.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

How to Cite

Nunes, D. A. M., Reigada, C. P. H., Garcia, M. J. M., Marques, D. P., Garcia, T. M. H. S., Haddad, C. M. F., Durante, . F. R., Frazão, M. S. V., Soares, R. M., & Neves Júnior, M. R. das. (2025). Palliative medicine and nutritional therapy in critically ill oncological patients: a systematic review. International Journal of Nutrology, 18(S3). https://doi.org/10.54448/ijn25S312